Dewald Brevis Not Allowed to DRS As Time Runs Out During RCB vs CSK IPL 2025 Match, Days After Fans Spot Rohit Sharma Opting for Review With Timer Hitting 슬롯사이트0슬롯사이트

The South African youngster was dismissed for a golden duck by his countryman and he failed to use the DRS on time. Later, replays showed that he would have been not out had he opted for the DRS right away.

Dewald Brevis (right) and DRS showing he would have been not out (left) (Photo credit: Star Sports)

The RCB vs CSK IPL 2025 match witnessed a dramatic moment when Dewald Brevis was not allowed to use the DRS (Decision Review System) after he was given out by the on-field umpire on May 3. This happened in the 17th over of the run-chase, bowled by Lungi Ngidi when he struck his countryman on his pads while the batter attempted a flick and he went up in appeal. Nitin Menon, the on-field umpire, raised his finger instantly and Dewald Brevis ran two. He then had a chat with Ravindra Jadeja before signalling that he wanted to use the DRS. But to his surprise, the umpire said he could not review as the time had run out. To make things more dramatic, the replay showed that he would not have been out had he used the DRS on time. This happened days after fans saw Rohit Sharma use the DRS despite the timer hitting '0'.슬롯 머신 사이트 추천Fans Point Out After Rohit Sharma Was Allowed To Use Review Despite 'Zero' on DRS Timer, Survives Close LBW Decision During RR vs MI IPL 2025 Match (Watch Video).

Dewald Brevis Unable to Use DRS as Time Runs Out

Timer When Dewald Brevis Signalled for DRS

Fan Draws Comparison Between Both Instances

(SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, viral trends and information from social media world, including Twitter (X), Instagram and Youtube. The above post is embeded directly from the user's social media account and LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body. The views and facts appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY, also LatestLY does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.)

Share Now